Energy Efficiency, Innovation, and Job Creation in California - REPORT
This study examines the economy-wide employment effects of California's efficiency policies over the last thirty-five years, and forecasts the economic effects of more aggressive policies proposed to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 in AB 32.
California Global Climate Change Legislative Timeline
June 1, 2005 - Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order #S-3-05 which called for a 30 percent reduction below business-as-usual of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
June 2006, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) released a "Draft Scoping Plan" – the policy roadmap to meet the emissions reduction target of 169 Million Metric Tons of Carbon (MMTCO2) equivalent by 2020 to stabilize at 427 MMTCO2 overall. The CARB board will take up final adoption of this plan in December 2008.
September 2006, the California legislature passed and Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB 32 (PDF download) into law, which mandates a first-in-the-nation limit on emissions that cause global warming.
|
Impact Study of California's Climate Change Legislation
Energy Efficiency, Innovation, and Job Creation in California (by David Roland-Holst, UC Berkeley, Oct. 2008) analyses the economic impact of CARB’s past and future policies to reduce fossil fuel generated energy demand. California’s achievements in energy efficiency over the last generation are well known, but evidence about their deeper economic implications remains weak.
This study examines the economy-wide employment effects of the state’s landmark efficiency policies over the last thirty-five years, and forecasts the economic effects of significantly more aggressive policies proposed to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
Core Findings
- Energy efficiency measures have enabled California
households to redirect their expenditure toward other
goods and services, creating about 1.5 million FTE
jobs with a total payroll of over $45 billion, driven by
well-documented household energy savings of $56
billion from 1972-2006.
- As a result of energy efficiency, California reduced
its energy import dependence, and directed a
greater percentage of its consumption to in-state,
employment-intensive goods and services, whose
supply chains also largely reside within the state,
creating a “multiplier” effect of job generation.
- The same efficiency measures resulted in slower
growth in energy supply chains, including oil, gas,
and electric power. For every new job foregone in
these sectors, however, more than 50 new jobs have
been created across the state’s diverse economy.
- Sectoral examination of these results indicates that
job creation is in less energy intensive services and
other categories, further compounding California’s
aggregate efficiency improvements and facilitating
the economy’s transition to a low carbon future.
Future Economic Impacts of Proposed Policies
Because of California's pioneering role in climate
policy, we face a significant degree of uncertainty
about direct and indirect effects of the many possible
approaches to its stated goals for emissions reduction.
Impact of Technological Change and Innovation in California's Economy
An important limitation of most prior California
economic modeling of climate policies is innovation
or technological neutrality. In this analysis, productivity, energy use intensities, and other innovation
characteristics were held constant across policy scenarios. Energy use and pollution levels might change, but the
prospect of innovation to reduce energy intensity was
not considered.
Most observers credit past technological progress to California’s energy/climate policy combinations of mandates and incentives.
California has reduced its aggregate
energy intensity steadily over this period, attaining levels
that today are 40 percent below the national average. Reductions in energy use were not flat across
the last thirty-five years; instead energy efficiency grew at
exponential rates.
To capture this innovation, we assume that, subject to
the implementation of the recommended measures,
California is able to increase its energy efficiency by one
additional percent per year, on an average basis, across
the economy.
Upcoming policy innovations such as "Cap and Trade", which is included in
the state’s Draft Scoping Plan, will put a price on carbon externalities that did not exist before.
When firms are faced with new costs from emissions and
energy use, they can be expected to make investments
in technology that reduces these costs. Thus, continuing innovation for energy efficiency will contribute to future economic stability and vitality.
By including the potential for innovation, the study finds that
the proposed package of policies in California ARB's Draft
Scoping Plan achieves 100 percent of the greenhouse
gas emissions reduction targets as mandated by AB
32 while increasing the Gross State Product (GSP) by
about $76 billion, increasing real household incomes
by up to $48 billion and creating as many as 403,000
new efficiency and climate action driven jobs.
Summary
Looking ahead, California’s ambitious plan to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions as mandated by
the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB
32) puts the state on a more stable economic path by
encouraging even greater investment in energy saving
innovation.
The current financial crisis reminds us of the
importance of responsible risk management. The
results of this study remind us that, in addition to
energy price vulnerability and climate damage, the
risks of excessive energy dependence include lower
long-term economic growth. A lower carbon future for
California is a more prosperous and sustainable future.
The Green Innovation Index
The Green Innovation Index is another report by Next 10 that analyzes key economic and environmental indicators that affect green innovation's role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming while growing our economy.
SOURCE:
Next 10
575 High Street, Suite 310
Palo Alto, California 94301
Phone: 650 321 5417
www.next10.org
Edited by Carolyn Allen, managing editor of Solutions For Green
Publication Date:
10/22/2008
|
|
